Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2017-07-07 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold and Silver | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 611.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP12 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.57 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, having an 81 score against 80.4. Even though the Galaxy C9 Pro and Galaxy Note Fan Edition were only released with a couple of months difference, Galaxy C9 Pro's body is thinner but heavier. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a bit faster CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a brighter display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a greater pixel quantity in each inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a little bit better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back camera with much less MP, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features as much memory for applications, games, photos and videos as Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, both have equal internal storage and an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. Galaxy C9 Pro has superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.