Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note II
32 GBN7100
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-08-29 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.94 x 3.17 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.44 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.56 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 980 hours standby time 35 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 3a XL is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note II, having a general score of 78.9 against 73.1. The Google Pixel 3a XL construction is extremely newer, just a little lighter and thinner than the Samsung Galaxy Note II. These phones use Android OS (Operating System), but the Google Pixel 3a XL has 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note II has Android 4.4.2.
Galaxy Note II has just a little better processing power than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has less RAM and a lower number of cores and they are also slower, it also counts with an additional GPU. Google Pixel 3a XL has a screen that is just as good as the display in Samsung Galaxy Note II, although the Google Pixel 3a XL also has a much better 1080 x 2160 resolution, a little larger screen and a much better screen pixels density.
Google Pixel 3a XL captures way better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note II, because it has a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition. The Google Pixel 3a XL has a little bit more storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note II, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage.
Google Pixel 3a XL has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note II, because it has 3700mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Google Pixel 3a XL is also a lot cheaper, which makes this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.