Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note II
HSPA+ OnlyN7100
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-08-29 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.94 x 3.17 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.44 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 215.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 980 hours standby time 35 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a XL has a global score of 78.9, which is just a bit better than Galaxy Note II's score of 74.8. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Google Pixel 3a XL has an older 11 version and Galaxy Note II has Android 4.4.2 version. Google Pixel 3a XL is a newer cellphone, and it's also a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner than Galaxy Note II.
The Samsung Galaxy Note II features a little faster processor than Google Pixel 3a XL, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of slower cores, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Google Pixel 3a XL counts with a display that is very similar to the screen in Samsung Galaxy Note II, although the Google Pixel 3a XL also has a way greater count of pixels per inch in the screen, a way higher 1080 x 2160 resolution and a little bigger screen.
The Google Pixel 3a XL captures much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy Note II, because it has a much better video definition and a camera with a way better 12.2 mega-pixels resolution. The Galaxy Note II has a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note II also has a SD memory slot that holds up to 64 GB.
The Google Pixel 3a XL features greater battery performance than Galaxy Note II, because it has a 19 percent bigger battery capacity.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Google Pixel 3a XL is also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.