Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note II
HSPA+ OnlyN7100
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1 | Android 14 |
| 2012-08-29 | -- |
| 5.94 x 3.17 x 0.37 inches | -- |
| 6.44 ounces | -- |
| Blue, Pink and White | -- |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| $ 215.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 7.48 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 980 hours standby time 35 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.12 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is just a bit better than Galaxy Note II, with a overall score of 82.2 against 74.8. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has older 14 version and Galaxy Note II has Android 4.4.2 version. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) is a noticeably thinner and incredibly lighter phone than Galaxy Note II.
The Galaxy Note II has a very superior performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an additional GPU. Samsung Galaxy Note II has a sharper screen than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a little lower pixel number in each screen inch and a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1280 x 720 resolution.
Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a greater camera than Galaxy Note II, because it has a camera with lot more mega-pixels and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a much greater memory for apps and games than Galaxy Note II, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note II, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3100mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.