Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note II
HSPA+ OnlyN7100
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2, 4.3, 4.1.2, 4.1.1 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2012-08-29 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.94 x 3.17 x 0.37 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.44 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Blue, Pink and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| -- | Plastic |
| $ 215.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 267 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.90 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.48 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM |
| 7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 980 hours standby time 35 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.12 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One Hyper is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note II, having a 79.8 score against 74.8. Motorola One Hyper's construction is extremely newer and just a little thinner, but also a little bit heavier than Samsung Galaxy Note II. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola One Hyper has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note II has Android 4.4.2 version.
Motorola One Hyper and Galaxy Note II feature quite similar screens, although the Motorola One Hyper also has a bigger screen, a better count of pixels per display inch and a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px. The Motorola One Hyper counts with a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note II, because it has an external memory slot that holds up to 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Note II has a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a lower number of cores and slower and less RAM memory, it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Motorola One Hyper has superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note II, because it has a 29 percent larger battery capacity.
The Motorola One Hyper features a way better camera than Galaxy Note II, because it has a lot better video resolution and a back camera with way more megapixels.
Although Motorola One Hyper is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy Note II, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Samsung Galaxy Note II. If you want to save a few dollars, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note II, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.