Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note II
US Cellular| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.1 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2012-09-19 | 2019-05-07 |
| 5.94 x 3.17 x 0.37 inches | 5.96 x 2.76 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.42 ounces | 5.19 ounces |
| Blue and White | Black, Purple and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 259.00 | $ 186.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 4 (4412) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 6.16 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 1.90 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.37 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 7.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3100mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 15 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.12 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 3a is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note II, getting a global score of 78.8 against 71.9. Google Pixel 3a's design is newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than Samsung Galaxy Note II. These devices include Android OS, but Google Pixel 3a has a newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy Note II has Android 4.1 version, so it offers lots of additional features.
Google Pixel 3a has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Note II, because it has a way better display pixel density, a little bit larger screen and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2220. The Galaxy Note II has a bit better processing power than Google Pixel 3a, because although it has an inferior number of cores and slower and 2 GB less RAM, it also counts with a GPU.
Google Pixel 3a has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note II, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy Note II features a little longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a, because it has a 3100mAh battery capacity.
Google Pixel 3a captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note II, because it has a much more MP back camera and a way higher (4K) video definition.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, the Google Pixel 3a is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.