Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-01-21 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is a bit better than LG V50 ThinQ's score of 83.7. Despite being the best in this comparison review, Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is an a bit thicker and a bit heavier phone than LG V50 ThinQ. These devices include Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has 11 version and LG V50 ThinQ has Android 10.
LG V50 ThinQ has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little faster processing unit than Galaxy Note10 Lite. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and 8 cpu cores. Galaxy Note10 Lite features just a bit better camera than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also counts with a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with just a bit longer battery duration than LG V50 ThinQ, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.