Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is much better than Motorola Droid Turbo, having a score of 86.2 against 76.4. Both devices in our current comparison work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has the older 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is somewhat heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo, it's a lot thinner and much newer.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a processor that's very similar to the Galaxy Note10 Lite one, because although the Motorola Droid Turbo has less 2.7 gigahertz cpu cores and less RAM, it also counts with a graphics co-processor. Motorola Droid Turbo has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
Galaxy Note10 Lite has a slightly better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back facing camera with a way worse resolution, it also counts with a bigger aperture for better photography in poorly lited situations. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a bit longer battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.