Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 score. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite is better than Motorola Edge 50, we must tell that it's also a older, just a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier cellphone. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 has Android 14 version.
Motorola Edge 50 has a better looking screen than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have a same size display, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a slightly higher resolution of 1220 x 2712px and a little bit more pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite features more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Motorola Edge 50 takes better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has lower video frame rate and a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a camera in the back with a lot higher resolution and a way bigger sensor.
Motorola Edge 50 has a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.