Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10 | -- |
| 2020-01-21 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite is much better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, getting a score of 86.2 against 76.4. Galaxy Note10 Lite's construction is way newer, but somewhat heavier and thicker than the Moto Z Force Droid Edition. Galaxy Note10 Lite features just a little better processing power than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a greater number of cores and 2 GB more RAM.
The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better display density. The Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a slightly bigger storage for apps and games than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB against 1,95 TB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with longer battery life than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a slightly better camera than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a camera with much less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture for better captures and video in low-light environments.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.