Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite is slightly better than OPPO Find X3 Pro, having an 86.2 score against 79.9. Galaxy Note10 Lite is an older, just a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier phone than the OPPO Find X3 Pro. These devices include the same Android 11 operating system. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has just a bit better display than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have a same size screen, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater screen pixel density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3216px.
Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with more storage for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1000 GB. OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a battery performance that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite's battery lifetime. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a superior camera than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels and a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.