Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-01-21 | 2018-08-27 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.39 x 3.03 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, with a overall score of 86.2 against 82.1. The Galaxy Note10 Lite design is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A8 Star's, although it's thicker and a little heavier. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note10 Lite has an older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A8 Star has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy Note10 Lite has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star. Both of them have a 6 GB RAM and the same number of cores. Galaxy Note10 Lite features a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a little better screen density, a bit larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a way bigger memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A8 Star, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal memory. Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A8 Star, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3700mAh.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite shoots a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A8 Star, because although it has a worse video quality and a back-facing camera with way less mega pixels resolution, and they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also counts with a bigger camera sensor taking better quality videos and photographs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.