Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 14 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.34 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro's overall score of 77.8. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note10 Lite has the older 11 version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version. Galaxy Note10 Lite's design is just a bit lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it's notably thicker and was released 4 years before.
Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a much better hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has a way better resolution of 2200 x 2480px, a little bit more pixels per inch in the screen and a bigger display.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have a F1.7 diafragm aperture, the vivo X Fold 3 Pro also has a much better video resolution, a back camera with a way higher 50 mega-pixels resolution and a much larger sensor taking way better quality pictures and videos.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.