Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 86.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-01-21 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.02 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 Lite is a little bit better than vivo X60 Pro, with an 86.2 score against 78.8. Even being the best phone in our current comparison, we must note that it's also an older, somewhat thicker and heavier phone. These devices work with the same Android 11 operating system. The vivo X60 Pro has a little bit better looking display than Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2376, it also counts with a little bit greater display density.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a little faster CPU than Galaxy Note10 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the vivo X60 Pro also has 6 GB more RAM memory. The vivo X60 Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light captures, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a camera in the back with a much higher resolution and a lot larger back camera sensor taking much better quality pictures.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a greater memory capacity for applications and games than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a little better battery performance than vivo X60 Pro, because it has a 7 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.