Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-08-23 | 2015-11-02 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is much better than the Google Nexus 6P's score of 80.3. Samsung Galaxy Note10's body is extremely newer and a bit lighter, but also a little bit thicker than the Google Nexus 6P. Google Nexus 6P counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a higher display pixel density.
Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Nexus 6P, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy Note10 captures clearer pictures and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a camera in the back with a worse 12 MP resolution, a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a tinier camera sensor shooting lower quality videos and pictures, it also counts with a way bigger aperture to take better photos and video in low-light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a much better storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Google Nexus 6P, because it has 128 GB more internal memory. The Google Nexus 6P and Samsung Galaxy Note10 both count with incredibly similar batteries duration, although the Google Nexus 6P has just 3450mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy Note10 is a lot more expensive than Google Nexus 6P, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.