Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2019-08-23 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black, Blue and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is just a bit better than the Google Pixel XL's general score of 81.3. The Galaxy Note10 is a noticeably newer device, and it is also just a little thinner and a little bit lighter than the Google Pixel XL. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a little faster processor than Google Pixel XL, because it has 4 more CPU cores and 4 GB more RAM.
The Google Pixel XL has a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Galaxy Note10 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a worse 12 mega pixels resolution camera, a tinier back camera sensor and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, it also counts with a way bigger camera aperture.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than Google Pixel XL, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. Google Pixel XL features a battery life that's just as good as the Galaxy Note10 one, although the Google Pixel XL has 3450mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 costs a bit more money than Google Pixel XL, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.