Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2019-08-23 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is much better than the LG V20's score of 77. Galaxy Note10's body is much newer and just a little lighter than the LG V20's, but it's also a bit thicker. The LG V20 counts with a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560.
The LG V20 features a bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Note10, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has just a little better performance than LG V20, because it has more cpu cores and 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy Note10 shoots a bit better videos and photos than LG V20, because although it has a lot less mega-pixels resolution camera and a worse (4K) video definition, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a bigger sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures. Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit superior battery lifetime than LG V20, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity instead of 3200mAh.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the LG V20, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the LG V20. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note10, else you can save some money and buy the LG V20, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.