Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2019-08-23 | 2017-09-21 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than the LG V30, having an 89 score against 79.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a newer phone than LG V30, but it is just a bit thicker and just a little heavier. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than LG V30, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM.
LG V30 features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2880 pixels. LG V30 counts with more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with just a bit better battery lifetime than LG V30, because it has 3500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. The Galaxy Note10 takes a bit better photographs and videos than LG V30, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video definition and a much worse resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a bigger camera sensor.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V30, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V30. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can get the LG V30, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.