Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-08-23 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a general score of 89, which is a little bit better than the LG V50 ThinQ's 83.7 general score. Even when Galaxy Note10 and the LG V50 ThinQ were released with only a couple months difference, Galaxy Note10 is a little thinner and a little bit lighter. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy Note10, because it has a little bit larger screen, a better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a higher screen density.
The LG V50 ThinQ's processing unit is very similar to the processor in Samsung Galaxy Note10, and although the LG V50 ThinQ has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. LG V50 ThinQ's camera is very similar to the Galaxy Note10 one, and although the LG V50 ThinQ has a tinier back camera sensor taking lower quality pictures, they both have the same video resolution, the same video frame rates, a 12 MP resolution back-facing camera and a same size diafragm aperture.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V50 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the LG V50 ThinQ. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Note10, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the LG V50 ThinQ, letting go a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.