Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is much better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 overall score. Galaxy Note10 is a way newer device, and it is also a little bit lighter and thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo. The Galaxy Note10 counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more cpu cores and more RAM.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels number per screen inch and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. Galaxy Note10 shoots slightly better videos and photos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a way less megapixels resolution back camera, it also counts with a way bigger camera aperture.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal memory. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy Note10, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Droid Turbo, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.