Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black and Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 score. The Galaxy Note10 is a notably newer phone, and it's also extremely thinner and a bit lighter than the Motorola DROID Turbo. Galaxy Note10 has a bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a brighter display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel count per screen inch and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage.
The Galaxy Note10 features a little bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a lower (4K) video quality and a way lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a way larger aperture for better low light captures and videos. The Motorola DROID Turbo features just a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has an 11% bigger battery size.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy Note10, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.