Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50, having an 89 score against 81.2. Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a just a bit lighter phone than the Motorola Edge 50, but both are equally thin. The Motorola Edge 50 has a more vivid display than Galaxy Note10, because it has a slightly better 1220 x 2712 resolution, a little greater pixels density and a little bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 has as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as the Galaxy Note10, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a very superior performance than Motorola Edge 50. Both have 8 cpu cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a lot bigger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a way higher 50 mega pixels resolution camera.
Motorola Edge 50 features a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.