Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 is much better than Motorola Moto G Stylus, getting an 89 score against 79.7. Galaxy Note10's construction is thinner and lighter than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, even though both were released with only 8 months difference. Galaxy Note10 features a bit more powerful CPU than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 counts with a bit sharper screen than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2280 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixel number in each inch in the display. Moto G Stylus shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note10, because although it has lower video frame rates and a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Moto G Stylus also counts with a way larger camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and photographs and a lot better 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera.
Moto G Stylus features a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Motorola Moto G Stylus has a bit superior battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Moto G Stylus. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Moto G Stylus, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.