Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2021-03-30 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 has an overall score of 89, which is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's overall score of 79.9. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is an older phone than OPPO Find X3 Pro, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat lighter and a bit thinner anyway. The OPPO Find X3 Pro features just a little better processing power than Galaxy Note10, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy Note10, because it has a higher resolution of 1440 x 3216 pixels, a bit larger screen and a higher count of pixels per inch of display. The OPPO Find X3 Pro has as much storage capacity to store more games and applications as Galaxy Note10, both of them have the same internal memory capacity.
OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with a better camera than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also counts with a back camera with much more megapixels and a way bigger sensor.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 29% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.