Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2019-08-23 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | TFT |
| 400 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a bit better than the Galaxy A32, having an 89 score against 84.7. Samsung Galaxy Note10's body is somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Galaxy A32, despite of the fact that it was released around a year before. Galaxy Note10 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A32, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy Note10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2280 and a greater pixel quantity per screen inch. The Galaxy A32 counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture and lower video frame rate, and they both have the same video definition, the Galaxy A32 also counts with a much better 48 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
The Galaxy Note10 features a slightly bigger storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A32 counts with a much longer battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 43 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.