Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 400 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy Note10's 89 score. The Galaxy A71 5G body is newer, but just a little thicker and just a little heavier than Samsung Galaxy Note10. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 features a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A71 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note10 and Samsung Galaxy A71 5G have similar displays, because although the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a just a little lower display pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a little bit bigger display. The Galaxy A71 5G has a better storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note10, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and worse video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a much larger back camera sensor and a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Galaxy A71 5G counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.