Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2019-08-23 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black and Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, with a general score of 89 against 81. Samsung Galaxy Note10's body is notably newer and somewhat lighter, but also thicker than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. Galaxy Note10 features a little sharper display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit larger screen, a little better pixels quantity per display inch and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2280 pixels.
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a superior storage for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 192 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note10 has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note10 also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note10 has a superior camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a lot larger camera aperture to capture better photos and video in low light situations. The Galaxy C9 Pro has a little better battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.