Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 950.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note10 is much better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting a overall score of 89 against 77.8. Samsung Galaxy Note10 is an extremely older and way thicker cellphone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung managed to build it much lighter anyway. The Galaxy Note10 counts with a much faster processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better screen than Galaxy Note10, because it has a little better pixel number in each screen inch, a larger screen and a much higher resolution of 2200 x 2480px. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a way higher resolution camera in the back, a lot bigger back camera sensor taking much higher quality videos and pictures and a way higher video quality.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note10, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy Note10 is also a lot cheaper, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.