Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-08-23 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note10 has a score of 89, which is better than vivo X60 Pro's 78.8 score. The Galaxy Note10 is an older and just a little bit thicker cellphone than the vivo X60 Pro, but Samsung could make it a little bit lighter anyway. Vivo X60 Pro features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a quite lower number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a little higher 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution and a quite larger display.
Vivo X60 Pro's memory to store more games and applications is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy Note10 one, they have the same 256 GB internal memory capacity. The vivo X60 Pro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy Note10, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with greater battery life than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity. Vivo X60 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note10, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the vivo X60 Pro also counts with a lot larger sensor and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.