Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| 2019-08-23 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.89 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white | Black, Blue and Red |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 950.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 400 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note10 has a global score of 89, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1's general score of 85.5. The Samsung Galaxy Note10 is a newer phone, and it's also thinner and a bit lighter than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little more vivid display than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a little worse 1080 x 2246 resolution and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixels density.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a CPU that's just as good as the Galaxy Note10 one, they have 8 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a much bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note10, and although they both have equal 256 GB internal memory, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3500mAh. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a camera that's very similar to the Galaxy Note10 one, and although the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a way smaller aperture which is not favorable for capturing pictures and/or video in low light situations, they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a same resolution camera, the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same back-facing camera sensor size.
Although Galaxy Note10 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Xiaomi Pocophone F1. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Xiaomi Pocophone F1, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.