Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2013-09-25 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is a bit better than Galaxy Note3's overall score of 77.7. Google Pixel 2's design is newer, just a bit thinner and somewhat lighter than the Galaxy Note3. The Google Pixel 2 has a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a higher number of cores (and they are faster) and a larger amount of RAM memory.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same 1080 x 1920 pixels resolution, the Google Pixel 2 also counts with a little bit more pixels per inch in the display. The Google Pixel 2 shoots clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has a back-facing camera with less megapixels resolution and a lower 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to capture better captures and videos in low light environments and a larger sensor taking higher quality photographs and videos.
The Google Pixel 2 has just a bit bigger storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note3 has longer battery performance than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 19% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.