Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | -- |
| 2013-09-25 | 2016-09-29 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note3 has a general score of 77.7, which is slightly better than the LG V20's 77 global score. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Note3 is notably older and just a little bit thicker than LG V20, it's body is still a little lighter. LG V20 features a bit sharper display than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have a display with the same size, the LG V20 also has a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better screen density.
The LG V20 features a much greater storage to install applications and games than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the LG V20 also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note3 has just a little better processing power than LG V20, although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The LG V20 counts with a battery lifetime that's just as good as the battery duration in Samsung Galaxy Note3. The LG V20 counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same video resolution, the LG V20 also has a bigger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a better resolution back facing camera and a bigger camera aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.