Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2013-09-25 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note3, getting an 83.7 score against 77.7. The LG V50 ThinQ construction has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, but it is just a bit heavier. Both of these devices work with Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little better performance than Galaxy Note3, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM. LG V50 ThinQ has a better looking display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a quite larger screen, a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels and more pixels per inch in the screen.
LG V50 ThinQ features a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note3, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a lower 3840x2160 video definition and a camera with a lower resolution, it also counts with a lot bigger aperture for better low light photography and a larger sensor shooting better quality photographs and videos.
The LG V50 ThinQ features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.