Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note3 has an overall score of 77.7, which is a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo's global score of 76.4. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy Note3 has an older 4.4.2 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. Galaxy Note3 is an older phone than Motorola Droid Turbo, but it's way thinner and a little bit lighter anyway.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a much sharper display than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater pixel number per display inch. The Motorola Droid Turbo features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have a Quad-Core CPU and 3 GB of RAM memory, the Motorola Droid Turbo also has an extra GPU.
Samsung Galaxy Note3 counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 64 GB internal storage and an external memory card slot that supports a maximum of 64 GB. The Motorola Droid Turbo features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has worse 24 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a larger aperture and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 22% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.