Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2014-10-28 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a general score of 77.9, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy Note3's 77.7 score. The Motorola DROID Turbo design is newer than Galaxy Note3's, although it is way thicker and a bit heavier. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola DROID Turbo has newer 4.4.4 version and Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version, counting with some nice extra features.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a much sharper display than Galaxy Note3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have 3 GB of RAM memory and a Quad-Core CPU, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has an extra graphics processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a much better memory to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note3 also has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 64 GB. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with better battery life than Galaxy Note3, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo shoots a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has worse 24 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a back-facing camera with way more MP.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.