Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 9.46 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto G Stylus is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, having a 79.7 score against 77.7. These phones include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Moto G Stylus has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version. The Motorola Moto G Stylus is a a lot newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, although it's just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Moto G Stylus features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has more RAM and 4 more CPU cores. The Moto G Stylus has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a bit more pixels per inch of display, a little bit higher 1080 x 2300px resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
Moto G Stylus counts with a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Note3, because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Motorola Moto G Stylus features better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 25% greater battery capacity.
Motorola Moto G Stylus features a way better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same 30 fps video frame rate, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels, a much bigger diafragm aperture for better captures and video in low light environments and a way bigger sensor taking much higher quality videos and photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.