Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 5.1 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2015-08-13 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.08 x 2.98 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 5.40 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 439.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 28 hours talk time |
| 5.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note3, having a global score of 79.3 against 77.7. Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ is a newer phone, and it's also thinner and just a bit lighter than Galaxy Note3. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S6 edge+ has a newer 5.1 version and Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version, counting with a couple additional features and improved performance.
Galaxy S6 edge+ has a brighter display than Samsung Galaxy Note3, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also has a better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution and a better pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy Note3 features a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with more CPU cores.
Galaxy S6 edge+ counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy S6 edge+ also has a bigger sensor which offers a better photo and video quality, a bigger camera aperture to take better low light photos and video and a camera in the back with more mega pixels.
Galaxy Note3 has a much greater memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S6 edge+, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy Note3 also has a SD card slot that allows up to 64 GB. Samsung Galaxy Note3 has just a bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S6 edge+, because it has a 3200mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.