Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 14 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is slightly better than Galaxy Note3, having a score of 77.8 against 77.7. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a incredibly newer and thinner cellphone than the Galaxy Note3, although it's heavier. These devices use Android OS, but vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the previous 14 version while Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note3 has a much faster processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a lower number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has an incredibly better looking display than Galaxy Note3, because it has a little more pixels per inch in the screen, a much larger screen and a much better resolution of 2200 x 2480px.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a lot bigger camera sensor capturing way higher quality videos and photographs, a lot higher 50 mega pixels resolution back facing camera and a lot bigger camera aperture for better low-light photography and videos.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior battery life than Galaxy Note3, because it has a 78% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.