Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 4.4.2 | Android 11 |
| 2013-09-25 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.93 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Pink and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 9.46 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.57 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy Note3, with a 78.8 score against 77.7. Vivo X60 Pro's design is incredibly newer and just a little bit thinner, but also a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy Note3. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but vivo X60 Pro has 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Note3 has Android 4.4.2 version.
Vivo X60 Pro features a superior CPU than Galaxy Note3, because it has 9 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores. The vivo X60 Pro has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2376, a little bit greater pixels density and a larger screen.
The vivo X60 Pro has a superior storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. The vivo X60 Pro takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy Note3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also has a much more megapixels camera, a larger camera aperture for better photos and videos in low-light situations, a lot larger sensor providing a way better image quality and better video frame rates.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note3, because it has a 31 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.