Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2014-09-29 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black, Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note4's 77.6 overall score. The Google Pixel 2 is a way newer cellphone, and it is also lighter and just a bit thinner than Galaxy Note4. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 features a bit better screen than Google Pixel 2, because it has a bit bigger display, a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a little more pixels per inch in the display.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a little bit better processing power than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Google Pixel 2 also has a larger amount of RAM. Google Pixel 2 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
Galaxy Note4 counts with improved battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3220mAh battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Note4 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for shooting images or video in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rates, the same back-facing camera sensor size and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note4 also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.