Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2014-09-29 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a score of 77.8, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Note4's general score of 77.6. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro construction is extremely newer and way thinner, but heavier than Galaxy Note4. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a lot better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because although it has a just a bit inferior count of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution and a much larger screen.
The Galaxy Note4 features a lot better processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has 13 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note4, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy Note4, because it has a lot more megapixels back facing camera, a lot larger aperture to take better photos and video in low-light situations, a way larger back camera sensor providing a much higher image quality and a much higher video resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a 5700mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.