Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.6 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2014-09-29 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Pink and White | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 5433 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 20 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP6 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 3.70 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3220mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.2 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X60 Pro is just a bit better than Galaxy Note4, getting a global score of 78.8 against 77.6. Vivo X60 Pro's design is a lot newer and just a little thinner, but a little heavier than the Galaxy Note4. Vivo X60 Pro has a greater processing power than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy Note4 has a bit sharper display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch of screen and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. The vivo X60 Pro takes better photos and videos than Galaxy Note4, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the vivo X60 Pro also has a larger aperture, higher 60 fps video frame rate, a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera and a lot larger camera sensor which provides a way better image and video quality.
The vivo X60 Pro has a very superior memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Note4, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with more internal storage. The vivo X60 Pro counts with longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note4, because it has a 30 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.