Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has an overall score of 81.2, which is a bit better than the Galaxy Note5's score of 80.2. The Motorola Edge 50 construction is way newer, but just a little thicker and a little bit heavier than the Galaxy Note5. Samsung Galaxy Note5 features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has 4 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a bit better looking display than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a bit worse 1220 x 2712px resolution and a quite worse quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a bigger display. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note5, because it has 192 GB more internal storage capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 has a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a larger aperture, a back facing camera with lot more MP and a lot larger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.