Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2021-03-30 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Blue and Gloss Black |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3216 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 526 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a general score of 80.2, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X3 Pro's 79.9 general score. Samsung Galaxy Note5's body is somewhat lighter and just a bit thinner than the OPPO Find X3 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. OPPO Find X3 Pro has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a bit higher 1440 x 3216 resolution, a larger screen and a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a very superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Note5, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. The OPPO Find X3 Pro counts with just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X3 Pro has a way better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. OPPO Find X3 Pro takes much better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X3 Pro also has a larger aperture to take better low-light captures and videos, a way larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photos, faster 60 fps video frame rate and a way more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.