Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2015-08-21 | -- |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | -- |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | -- |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3080 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 500 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 69.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Note5, having an 81.5 score against 80.2. The Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra body is way lighter but somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Note5. The Samsung Galaxy Note5 has just a bit better screen than Galaxy S23 Ultra, because although it has a little lower 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a little greater display pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy Note5 features a lot better performance than Galaxy S23 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. The Galaxy S23 Ultra counts with much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S23 Ultra has a much better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos, a bigger camera aperture for better images and videos in low-light situations and a lot more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.