Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.18 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 is a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, getting an 80.2 score against 77.8. Galaxy Note5's body is notably lighter than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but it is a lot thicker and was released 9 years before. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy Note5, because although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a really larger screen and a better resolution of 2200 x 2480px.
The Samsung Galaxy Note5 has a very superior processing power than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 512 GB internal storage capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a really longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a greater camera than Galaxy Note5, because it has a way bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a bigger aperture, a back camera with way more megapixels and a much better 7680x4320 video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.