Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.2 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2015-08-21 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black sapphire, Gold platinum, Silver titan and White pearl | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2100 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T760 MP8 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.3 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note5 is a bit better than the vivo X60 Pro, having a global score of 80.2 against 78.8. Galaxy Note5's body has the same thickness than the vivo X60 Pro, but it is just a little bit lighter. The vivo X60 Pro counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM.
Galaxy Note5 has a bit better looking display than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixels density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Vivo X60 Pro counts with a superior memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, because it has 192 GB more internal storage.
Vivo X60 Pro shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note5, and although they both have the same video resolution, the vivo X60 Pro also has a lot larger sensor which gives a much better photo and video quality, a bigger camera aperture for better low light captures, a camera with a much higher resolution and faster video frame rate.
The vivo X60 Pro counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy Note5, because it has a 40% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.