Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| 2016-08-02 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 is a bit better than the Galaxy Note7, with a general score of 81.6 against 79.5. The Google Pixel 2 design has the same thickness than Galaxy Note7, but it is lighter. Google Pixel 2 counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Google Pixel 2 also has a higher number of faster cores.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 features a slightly better display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution, a little bit larger display and a quite greater display pixels density. The Galaxy Note7 has a slightly better storage to install games and applications than Google Pixel 2, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that admits up to 256 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 counts with better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3500mAh battery size instead of 2700mAh. Google Pixel 2 shoots just a bit better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller back camera sensor capturing lower quality videos and pictures and a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Google Pixel 2 also counts with a camera in the back with more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.