Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| 2016-08-02 | 2016-09-29 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 515 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 29.00mm focal length |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 has a global score of 79.5, which is a bit better than LG V20's overall score of 77. Samsung Galaxy Note7's body is just a little bit lighter but just a little bit thicker than LG V20, and they were released with only 2 months difference. LG V20 has a display that is just as good as the screen in Samsung Galaxy Note7, both of them have an equal 1440 x 2560px resolution, the same pixels density and a display of the same size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 and the LG V20 both count with extremely similar CPUs, both of them have the same RAM memory amount and a Quad-Core processing unit. The LG V20 captures slightly better photographs and videos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low light images and video and a tinier sensor which offers a lower image and video quality, and they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same (4K) video resolution, the LG V20 also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels.
LG V20 features a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note7, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V20 also has an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note7 has a little longer battery performance than LG V20, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.