Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2016-08-02 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black onyx, Blue coral, Gold platinum and Silver titanium | Black and Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 530 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.44 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note7 has an overall score of 79.5, which is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo's general score of 77.9. Samsung Galaxy Note7's design is newer, incredibly thinner and just a little lighter than the Motorola DROID Turbo. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Note7, because although it has a bit smaller screen, and they both have the same exact resolution of 2560 x 1440px, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a just a little higher display pixel density.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy Note7, because although it has 1 GB less RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Motorola DROID Turbo takes a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy Note7, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures and videos in low light situations and slower 24 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video definition, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a way more MP back camera.
The Samsung Galaxy Note7 has much more storage to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note7 also has an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB. Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy Note7, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.